Rigged Clinical Trials: Drug Studies Favor the Pharmaceutical Companies Companies more concerned with profits than with patients | |
![]() | |
Global Research, November 7, 2008 | |
Orthomolecular Medicine News Service - 2008-11-05 | |
If you have often suspected that drug studies are rigged by the pharmaceutical manufacturer, you are right. "Drug studies skewed toward study sponsors," reported The Washington Post. (1) "Industry-funded research often favors patent-holders, study finds." Specifically, the American Journal of Psychiatry study authors said, "In 90% of the studies, the reported overall outcome was in favor of the sponsor's drug... On the basis of these contrasting findings in head-to-head trials, it appears that whichever company sponsors the trial produces the better antipsychotic drug." (2)
You will rarely hear academia complain. Why? Because they are aboard the gravy train. Dr. Angell: "Columbia University, which patented the technology used in the manufacture of Epogen and Cerezyme, collected nearly $300 million in royalties" in 17 years. "The patent was based on NIH-funded research." That means you, the taxpayer, footed the bill. Harvard is in just as deep. In its own Faustian dealings with the drug companies, "a Harvard hospital has a deal that gives Novartis rights to discoveries that lead to new cancer drugs ... Merck is building a twelve-story research facility next door to Harvard Medical School . . . In Harvard Medical School 's Dean's Report for 2003-4, the list of benefactors included about a dozen of the largest drug companies."
READ THE COMPLETE Story - found at the the Center for Research Globalization
by Posting your comments
============================================








1 comments:
I am not shocked, greed knows no boundaries. I was shot down at an MS meeting when I questioned a drug company rep whether drug companies really were looking at all for a cure. Takes more than pizza and pens to win me over. I don't want maintenance I want my life back.
Vivian Tanis
Post a Comment