I appreciate what you are doing. My wife is quadriplegic, on a ventilator due to MS. Bedridden for 15 years.
I have hopes for stem cells and other possible cures. When I went to the site concerning the experiences in China with stem cell therapy, I noticed a pattern: generally enthusiastic praise for the treatment during and a few weeks after, followed by no further comments or a rare negative one on lack of progressw. The big improvements were to come within a few months and seem not to have occurred. We need to know the unvarnished truth, even if that diminishes the likelihood of a placebo effect.
Now I see other treatments being covered with a similar pattern: early this and early that.
Follow ups are needed!
Douglas W. Cooper, Ph. D.
Click to view their family webpage: http://tinyurl.com/mfyh47
email Douglas at: firstname.lastname@example.org
or leave a comment on this blog site posting ( not on the facebook page that this will also appear)
Be empowered with MS views and news. To receive The MS BEACON e-Newsletter, CLICK HERE - -
Visit our MS learning channel on YouTube, which provides hundreds of MS educational videos presented by MS Experts from across the USA. Archived here: www.youtube.com/msviewsandnews -- Also please visit our Social media platforms: Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram . Each providing important information for the MS community. Furthermore, scroll down the left side of this blog to learn from the resources and links.
Disclaimer: 'MS Views and News' DOES NOT endorse any products or services found on this blog. It is up to you to seek advice from your healthcare provider. The intent of this blog is to provide information on various medical conditions, medications, treatments, for your personal knowledge and to keep you informed of current health-related issues. It is not a substitute for the advice of your physician. Should you or your family members have any specific medical problem, seek medical care promptly.
Thursday, December 24, 2009
Wednesday, December 23, 2009
We are at a critical juncture in the effort to overhaul and improve our nation's health care system. MS activists played an important role in shaping the process, from release of the Society's National Health Care Reform Principles to relentlessly making calls and sending emails to ensure that the legislation adequately supports those living with MS. As the Senate completes work on its health reform package, MS activists must rise to the occasion one more time. The Senate could vote as early as tomorrow--scroll down to email your Senators now. Urge your Senators to support the Senate health reform bill.
The Senate bill makes substantial investments that will improve the lives of people living with MS and other chronic conditions or disabilities. In line with the Society's Principles, the Senate bill:
People living with MS and other chronic conditions are particularly vulnerable in our current health care system. We need meaningful reform now.
Every vote counts. CLICK HERE, then Scroll down and take action now. Urge both of your Senators to support the health reform bill so that we can seize this historic opportunity and take a true step towards accessible, affordable, comprehensive, quality health care for all.
The information provided above, comes from The National MS Society
Tuesday, December 22, 2009
National MS Society Continues to Propel Research Forward end MS - Launches 2010 With Call for Research Grants to Pursue CCSVI
2009 saw exciting research progress, unprecedented opportunities on the horizon, and more scientists than ever working on resolving important questions. Despite the year’s economic and financial challenges, the National Multiple Sclerosis Society continues to propel research forward to end MS.
New York, NY (Vocus/PRWEB ) December 22, 2009 -- 2009 saw exciting research progress, unprecedented opportunities on the horizon, and more scientists than ever working on resolving important questions. Despite the year’s economic and financial challenges, the National Multiple Sclerosis Society continues to propel research forward to end MS. In 2009 the Society provided over $33.5 million to support 345 new and ongoing projects in its research portfolio, plus $1.5 million for Fast Forward, the Society’s drug development subsidiary which continues to attract new funding streams. In addition, thanks to the efforts of our MS activists, $5 million was specifically allocated for funding MS research out of the 2009 Department of Defense budget.
As 2009 comes to a close, the Society maintains its nimble pursuit of promising research opportunities to end MS and has issued an international call for grant applications to expeditiously examine the potential impact of the chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) hypothesis on disease process in MS. Working with MS Societies around the world, an international panel will be convened to conduct a joint expedited review of the grant applications submitted in order to ensure a coordinated, strategic approach to funding the best research examining the CCSVI hypothesis in 2010. http://www.nationalmssociety.org/news/news-detail/index.aspx?nid=2206
The following is just a small sample of the many important, potentially high-impact research results that occurred during 2009, which support the Society’s three research goals: stopping MS, reversing the damage and restoring function, and ending MS forever.
Monday, December 21, 2009
In collaboration with other organizations, MS Views and News uses state-of-the-art communication channels to provide information for those affected by, or interested in MS.
Hope and Elation - Frustration and Anger – Fear and Loathing: The Contrasting Emotional Responses to the Revolutionary Discoveries in MS Made by Dr Za
By Dr. Ashton Embry
The beautifully crafted, CTV documentary on the astounding findings of Dr Zamboni and his team for multiple sclerosis has hit the MS community like a tidal wave and has evoked a variety of emotional responses. Most people with MS see CCSVI as a huge breakthrough for understanding and treating MS and had an initial feeling of unbridled elation that finally there was some real hope for an effective treatment on the horizon. I expect most people with MS thought "I have to get my veins checked out!", even before the credits rolled on the Zamboni documentary.
Such a reaction is completely understandable. Dr Zamboni’s research leaves very little doubt that most people with MS have impaired venous flow from the brain and that such a problem is caused by narrowings and outright blockages in the main veins which drain the brain. To anyone with a semblance of objectivity, this is a "no drainer". I might note that small studies in Poland and at both Stanford and the University of Buffalo in the USA have already confirmed these findings. The University of Buffalo is now doing a very large study to add further confirmation. I would be willing to bet the farm that this study will validate Dr Zamboni’s findings and, most importantly, it will silence the vocal skeptics, many of whom are neurologists with a blatant conflict of interest regarding the emergence of a potentially effective, non-drug treatment.
I have noticed from discussions with numerous persons with MS over the past few weeks that the initial feelings of excitement and hope have been replaced in many cases by anger and frustration. This has come about because everyone is finding it impossible to get an MRV to determine if they indeed have venous blockages. In Calgary, one person I was speaking with called every private imaging clinic and got no where. The receptionist at each clinic simply read a prepared response they had gotten from Alberta Health that there is not enough evidence to warrant such a scan. I quote from a November 26th email from the manager of one clinic "Until we get further instruction … we don't feel that ethically we can institute these scans for patients". Always nice to know the Alberta government is out there making sure persons with MS do not find out if they have a serious venous problem or not.
I have spoken to a few dozen persons with MS and each one expressed their burning desire to find out if CCSVI affects them and if so, how badly. And each one was very angry and frustrated that there was no way they could get such an important test done. The fact that the government substantially contributed to the problem only made them angrier.
When it comes to fear and loathing, I expect these feelings are being harboured by other constituencies of the MS community, namely the MS clinicians, researchers, drug
companies and charities. Why would such pillars of medicine fear and hate CCSVI? Regarding the clinicians, I have no doubt that they quickly realized that, if relief of CCSVI is an effective treatment, especially for the newly diagnosed, then they would essentially be cut out of the action when it comes to treating MS patients. Once a person was diagnosed with MS they would be immediately be referred to a vascular specialist who would then oversee the person’s treatments. It would be "diagnose and adios" for the neurologists, a somewhat ironic development given that is how the neurologists used to treat MS patients before the advent of MS drugs in the mid-90s .
As far as the MS researchers go, I can definitely empathize with them. I have been involved in research for over 40 years and I know, if someone suddenly demonstrated that I had spent the last 40 years barking up the wrong tree, I would have a variety of intense, negative feelings. One thing that has never been mentioned is how the Zamboni results demonstrate that the EAE animal model, which is widely used in MS research and upon which 10s of millions of dollars are spent every year, is clearly not suitable and is almost worthless. The mice do not develop CCSVI and thus the EAE model is no better than an animal model in which the mice developed CCSVI but no CNS lesions. A viable animal model for MS needs to exhibit both phenomena – end of story. Such a realization will cause great gnashing of teeth in the wide world of MS research.
It is also not a stretch to predict that fear and loathing in the MS research community will turn to anger and I hope Dr Zamboni is prepared for some blistering attacks on both his work and his character. Hell hath no fury like a researcher proven wrong or disenfranchised. Finally, I won’t belabour the fears and anger of both the clinicians and the researchers regarding the potential loss of all that drug company largesse and research money which has been a bonanza over the past 15 years.
That brings us to the drug companies that supply the drugs that currently are used to treat MS or are in development. I have no doubt these companies must be having hand-wringing meetings these days to discuss the threat of a potentially effective, non-drug treatment for MS. The boardrooms must reek of fear and loathing when the obvious implications of the Zamboni discoveries are discussed. The bottom line is that there are tens and possibly hundreds of billions of dollars at stake in the foreseeable future and the drug companies are not going to let that kind of serious cash simply disappear without a fight. It is impossible to predict how the companies will deal with this real threat to their bottom lines and stock prices but you know it is not going to be pretty.
Finall,y I suspect there is a lot of fear and loathing going on at the national MS societies in the countries with high rates of MS (e.g. Canada). For the MS Society of Canada this has been a public relations disaster which potentially will translate into a loss of revenue. The most obvious, embarrassing aspect of this fiasco is the fact that MSSOC wasn’t even aware of the Zamboni research until mid October when they put up on their website a few, pathetic paragraphs on CCSVI that were cribbed from NMSS. They had absolutely no plans to fund any research on CCSVI until the CTV documentary put a gun to their head and they then hastily cobbled together a press release (in which Dr Zamboni’s name was mis-spelt) and issued a call for CCSVI research proposals.
The big question is why, with their blue-ribbon scientific advisory board, did MSSOC have no clue about CCSVI when papers on the subject began appearing in 2006 and major contributions were publicly available in late 2008 and early 2009. Were all their scientific advisors asleep at the switch? Assuming these renowned researchers read the scientific literature, do they have they the ability to recognize a watershed contribution when it crosses their desk? The fact CCSVI went unnoticed by MSSOC for more than a year is cause for serious concern about the competency of the organization in terms of providing reliable and timely scientific information to their members. What other important information is currently out there going unnoticed by MSSOC and its scientific advisors?
To sum up, Dr Zamboni’s amazing and groundbreaking discoveries have induced a wide variety of emotions in the different factions of the MS community. Such emotions are going to make it even harder for his findings to be properly tested and, if proven to be correct, to be incorporated into clinical practice. Regardless, it is important to realize that such strong emotions exist and to be cognizant of the different and somewhat antagonistic views and goals of the two groups that comprise the MS family – those that live with MS and those that live off MS.
article can be found here
Sunday, December 20, 2009
My multiple sclerosis interview: it seems ages ago now that we offered you an opportunity to interview me, doesn’t it? The summer has slipped away and my schedule has compressed as I move closer to my wedding (October 10, Rusty). For those of you just joining us I posted a blog topic that allowed you (the MS community) to post any questions you might wish to ask me about my multiple sclerosis via the comment section. The questions below are the result of that post. You put great thought into your questions and I wanted to do the same for my answers.
So, at long last, here it is your interview with me. I hope you enjoy. –Trevis!
Click here to be re-directed to his blog to read this in-depth interview and his logic answers.
If you want, return here to tell me what you think of his answers, by leaving a comment...