A web-blog (formerly known as Stu's Views and MS News), now published by MS Views and News, a patient advocacy organization. The information on this blog helps to Empower those affected by Multiple Sclerosis globally, with education, information, news and community resources.
~~ Scroll left side of this blog for needed resources. Also, use our 'search by topic' tool, to find specific information.
Disclaimer: 'MS Views and News' DOES NOT endorse any products or services found on this blog. It is up to you to seek advice from your healthcare provider. The intent of this blog is to provide information on various medical conditions, medications, treatments, and procedures for your personal knowledge and to keep you informed of current health-related issues. It is not intended to be complete or exhaustive, nor is it a substitute for the advice of your physician. Should you or your family members have any specific medical problem, seek medical care promptly.
Monday, April 9, 2018
Poor Encoding and Weak Early Consolidation Underlie Memory Acquisition Deficits in Multiple Sclerosis: Retroactive Interference, Processing Speed, or Working Memory?
Learning and memory impairments are common in multiple sclerosis (MS) and may be related to difficulty acquiring (encoding or consolidating) new information. We evaluate the role of retroactive interference and investigate whether minimizing interference immediately following encoding (early during consolidation) will improve MS participants’ ability to remember new verbal information. Additionally, we investigate processing speed differences between memory-impaired and unimpaired participants and present an exploratory analysis of how the dual-components of working memory (capacity vs. processing) relate to memory impairment.
MS memory-unimpaired (N = 12) and MS memory-impaired participants (N = 12) were compared to healthy controls (N = 15). Interference onset following encoding (early, mid, late, no interference) was manipulated over the retention interval of a verbal learning and memory task. Response times (RT) were recorded during interference trials.
MS memory-impaired participants encoded less information and lost proportionally more information over the retention interval (weak consolidation). Lengthening the onset of interference did not benefit memory performance in this sample. Memory performance was unrelated to RT but was related to performance on the Symbol Digit Modalities Test. Primary capacity of working memory did not differ across groups; however, secondary memory processing was reduced for MS memory-impaired participants.
Minimizing interference following encoding did not improve memory in this sample. Both initial encoding and early consolidation were reduced for memory-impaired MS participants. Evidence for a relationship between processing speed and memory was mixed and depended on the processing speed assessment used. Memory impairment in MS may be partially due to inefficient processing within working memory.