Please visit our MS learning channel on YouTube, which provides hundreds of MS related topics from many of our video recorded education programs and archived here: www.youtube.com/msviewsandnews -- Be empowered with MS views and news. Opt-in with us: www.register.msviewsandnews.org


~~ Scroll left side of this blog for needed resources. Also, use our 'search by topic' tool, to find specific information.


Disclaimer: 'MS Views and News' DOES NOT endorse any products or services found on this blog. It is up to you to seek advice from your healthcare provider. The intent of this blog is to provide information on various medical conditions, medications, treatments, and procedures for your personal knowledge and to keep you informed of current health-related issues. It is not intended to be complete or exhaustive, nor is it a substitute for the advice of your physician. Should you or your family members have any specific medical problem, seek medical care promptly.

=================================================


Friday, June 15, 2018

Associations Between Physiological and Perceived Fall Risk in Multiple Sclerosis

Patients with multiple sclerosis often report impaired mobility as a top concern.Patients with multiple sclerosis often report impaired mobility as a top concern.
Patients with multiple sclerosis have a disparity between their physiological risk of falling and their perceived risk of falling, both of which correspond to the risk for recurrent falls, according to a study published in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
The study included 416 participants with multiple sclerosis of all subtypes. Physiological fall risk was assessed and scored using the Physiological Profile Assessment (PPA), and the perceived fall risk was assessed and scored using the Falls Efficacy Scale-international questionnaire (FESi). Retrospective assessments of fall incidence were done via interview, although prospective assessments were done using standardized daily diary sheets for recording falls.
Data analyses found that higher FESi and PPA scores increased the odds of participants being recurrent fallers [FESi odds ratio [OR] 1.05 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.07), PPA OR 1.30 (95% CI 1.17-1.46)], with PPA being the superior predictor. In the low physiological and high perceived risk group, 37% of participants (n=63) were identified as recurrent fallers. Some of these participants may have had additional physical risk factors such as spasticity, impaired gait, and dual task interference, which are not included in the PPA, making their scores less predictive of falls.
More than half of the high physiological and low perceived risk group (10% of total participants) reported no falls,   

                      
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

No comments: